Chivalry rediscovered: the forgotten glory of being a gentleman

A couple of housekeeping notes! You may have already noticed that I’ve put up a few photographs on my Flickr account (180 photos, to be precise!). They are as-yet unorganized, arranged by the date taken and nothing else. I intend to put descriptions on them…. eventually, but for now I’ve put them up in the hope that you can enjoy and reflect on some of the sites here in the Holy Land.

With regards to comments, I’d like to remind you that I do enjoy hearing from you! Its especially a nice touch from the homeland out here. If I don’t publish your comment, please don’t be offended. It may be that though it was not uncharitable or bad, but that I felt it more prudent not to have certain things up for anyone to read. You never know who might be reading. Rest assured that I do read your comments!

Finally, for the ladies who may read this blog, know that I will be writing (shortly, because I have finally! finished my last paper) something about the counterpart to chivalry. I highly recommend this post, not just because I wrote it but also because it may help you know what to expect in us men!

(Post-script: you may notice that I have put up a link to the USCCB vocation video “Fishers of Men”. I have, of course, received permission to do so, and invite everyone to watch it if you haven’t already – or watch it again if you have. Pray for vocations!)


One of my hobbies is to watch people. While walking in the mall, talking on the sidewalk, drinking frappucinos at Starbucks, it is always revealing to see how one person treats another. But the problem with people-watching in modern culture is that one is inevitably frustrated at the behavior of others.

Just a little while ago, I was at the post office here in Jerusalem. As I left with the friend I was accompanying, I overhead the strident voice of an angry young man.

Turning around, I saw him, probably between eighteen and twenty. The female clerk he was speaking to, in an increasingly loud voice, didn’t seem to understand English and certainly didn’t have the packing material he wanted. He began to talk down to her in a rude and sarcastic tone, speaking with insultingly exaggerated slow speech. Shortly he stomped off.

In seminary and simply in life, we learn that we have to overcome the initial shock that comes when our fellow man behaves poorly, but such exchanges never fail to anger me. Something wrong just occurred, and we men need to acknowledge and address the problem. We have forgotten what it is to be a good man, to be a gentle man.

The concept of a gentleman has been something that has captured my imagination and desire from the first time I picked up medieval stories. Reading many of the classic books – and many contemporary stories – the gentleman of a story stands out. We all are familiar, at least from the use of the word in movies, with what a gentleman is.

The fabled gentleman: the one who knows how to behave in every situation, has a impeccable manners (especially with regards to women) and has a working knowledge of many, if not all, the common and finer points of culture. He is a man who others respect instinctively while he simultaneously dignifying them simply by his presence of being towards them.

It seems to me that the gentleman is a dying breed.

You can find examples of gentlemen throughout the ‘golden age’ of Hollywood movies. ‘Guess who’s coming to dinner’, ‘Casablanca’, ‘Lillies of the Field’ to name a few of my favorites. And if you start looking at literature, well! You’ll be overwhelmed by gentlemen.

Gender: a natural sign of invisible realities.

Men and women are not the same. We are equal in dignity, but not in physical or emotional stature. There are obvious differences that need not be detailed. More than that are the natural, but differing strengths of men & women. Barring the exceptionally strong woman or the exceptionally weak man, men are stronger and bigger than women. Likewise barring the exceptionally sensitive man or the exceptionally apathetic woman, women are more nurturing and intuitive than men.

There is more to it, of course, but these are generally agreed-upon facets of the genders.

Power, strength, physical ability, these are things that also beget responsibility. In line with my love of superheroes (the arch-type of many American ideals being Superman), I would quote Ben Parker: “With great power comes great responsibility. Remember that. . . .” Women are (generally) physically weaker than men, and so we have a duty to safeguard them. And more than that, women are the tabernacles of humanity, bringing life into the world through their actions and their very bodies. No man can do this, but it is every man’s job to honor and protect that potential in women. It does not matter that a woman is barren or that she is celibate; she is worthy of respect and care by virtue of her extraordinary grace of motherhood – physical or spiritual. It is part of every woman’s nature.

There have been travesties that have come out of misguided ideas of chivalry, but the best definition of chivalry is the duty of a man to honor God, serve his country and respect & protect his fellow man, most especially women.

Equal in dignity, yet in varied (but complementary) ways

Whenever anyone mentions differences in men and women, the question of ‘equality’ comes to the fore. Before you can say ‘boo’, accusations of chauvinism and feminism are thrown out. I’d like to clarify myself before going too much further. Men and women are equal in their dignity as human beings, both genders having been created in the image of God. Anyone who denies this, in part or entirely, is guilty of a most serious fault in charity (as well as good theology).

But we can not simply say that men and women are equal. Equality is a mathematical term. The number two equals one plus one (2 = 1 + 1). The sum on both sides is exactly the same. Men and women are not numbers, and they are not exactly the same. Its a mistake to say that two different people are the same, much moreso to say that the two different genders (which encompass every individual person in the world) are the same. Just as each person has strengths and weakness proper to his person, so each gender (generally) has strengths and weakness proper to it.

If you think that I am somehow saying that women are lesser than men (or vice versa), please re-read this section. The point here is to simply recognize that men and women are not equal in the precise meaning of the word. If we can’t recognize the differences in each other, we won’t be able to go any further in understanding how we are to behave in the roles that these difference place us.

Rising to the challenge of true manhood

In the USCCB’s new vocation video<, a priest made a remark that resonated with me and I suspect would do so with anyone:

“I think young people want the challenge of being pulled to something more than just mediocrity. All young people, I think, have that deep desire to do something remarkable – to be someone remarkable.”

Does that sound familiar to anyone? It is a powerful true-ism, despite remaining unarticulated within most of us. In the case of masculine dignity, I would say that every young boy, every man, wants to be a gentleman – or starts out wanting to be a gentlemen.

Maybe that sounds strange – but consider the opposite: how many men want to become rude and offensive slobs? Hopefully none, but certainly very few. The rest of us become that way because we become lazy or because we discover that the work of being a gentleman is difficult. Not too difficult, but it takes a conscious and sometimes significant effort.

Human pottery 101: the formation of a gentleman

In today’s world it seems like the idea of a gentleman has been replaced with the suave, debonair and sophisticated person of James Bond (well, James Bond until Pierce Brosnan left…). And while the idea of James Bond encapsulates some of the things that make up a gentleman, he is lacking in the two greatest qualities of what it is to be a gentle man: humility and respect of others.

The simple and short answer is that mankind was created in the image of God. Simply put, to act in any manner that is opposed to our nature – the reflection of God – damages the dignity that we carry in what we are.

In fact, the dignity of mankind doesn’t stop with ourselves. Despite any solitude of our lives and actions, everything we do has an effect on those around us. And our absence, too, can affect others. If absence can affect others indirectly, and actions directly, how much can consciously good actions positively affect others?

What is a Gentleman?

Among the many qualities that come together to form a complete gentleman, there are a few that strike me as being at the core of the matter: demeanor, behavior and culture.

Demeanor

The first things that shouts ‘gentleman’ is the way that he carries himself. His movements convey both confidence, humility and respect. He stands up straight, shakes your hand firmly while looking you in the eye and gently smiles while inviting you to tell him a bit about you. In the way that he carries himself, he conveys to the world that he is a gentleman while simultaneously looking to selfless be with others. He respects himself enough to stand proud, but his attention is devoted to attending to those around him.

Behavior

The second indicator is how a man comports himself in the company of others. In short, he looks to preserve the dignity and comfort of those around him. Gossip, uncharitable words, impolite conversation and even topics that are unpleasant (or controversial) are taboo in his presence, save perhaps in private conversations when the person for whom those words are necessary won’t be embarrassed in front of others. And a gentlemen never allows or purposely directs the conversation to settle on himself. He speaks and acts so as to preserve and enhance the dignity of those around him.

Culture

The gentleman has allowed himself to be formed and disciplined in the world. He is well-read and generally familiar with the goods of the world – though neither disdainful nor enslaved by them. I have heard it said of Bishop Fulton J. Sheen (although I have no reliable source or quote) that he recommended each priest to be familiar with the finer things of life – cigars, beverages, for example – while not being enslaved to them. This wasn’t so that the priest could enjoy the comforts of these things, but that a priest could approach any person in his or her own environment. Despite being independent of the things of the world, such a gentleman could relate to a person at any context.

Righteousness

Finally, the gentleman has a unswerving sense of right and wrong, of justice in the world. When the rights of another are being trampled upon, the gentleman stands up for them, especially when the other is unable to do so alone. All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing. But when even one person challenges injustice, others are inspired to do the same.

You could spend your entire life searching for the best way to be a gentleman and never achieve it fully. But it would be a life well spent. The starting point of chivalry is the ability to say two simple phrases: “You’re right” and “I’m sorry”. Beyond just saying them, we need to be able to both mean them and act on them. Acknowledging the dignity of others, especially when they in the right, and humbly admitting our own faults is a sure path to holiness.

Being a gentleman is not an easy goal to achieve in today’s society. The strangest of contradictions center around how modern society thinks men should behave. You may find even priests who behave like cads and the stoutest of atheists behaving like gentlemen. But it is the example of Christ that teaches us that there is a right way to live, and the life of a gentleman has no better guide than our Lord.

Peace,
Jacob M.

E-mail, print & share options
This entry was posted in Old Blog (blogger), Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Chivalry rediscovered: the forgotten glory of being a gentleman

  1. Jacob says:

    A note on comments
    Comments are a great thing: a chance for you to respond to a post and for me to hear you.

    However, be aware that comments are always public; anyone can read them. Personal or contact information will be accessible to everyone: good and bad folks alike.

    Prudence, then, should be your guide about what you say in this (public) forum; identifying information about yourself or other should be avoided at all costs

    Though I love comments, I am not always able to respond. But I do read all comments and it truly is a joy to hear from you.

    Peace!
    - Jacob Maurer

    P.S. Even if you do not have a blogger account, you can put in a name to your comments. Simply select ‘Other’ under ‘Choose an identity‘ (just below the comment box) and put in a name.

    Do not put in your full name if you want to maintain anonymity – your first name or a psuedonym would be fine. It personalizes your message to put some kind of name and I can address you better if I respond to your comment.

    P.P.S. Because of some recent (anonymous) abuses of the comment feature here, I have setup the blog to send any comments to me for approval. Not to worry, I will never edit comments – I simply need to ensure that comments that are put on my own blog reflect the charity and values that I hold to. Comments that don’t fit that criteria will not be permitted publication.

  2. antonina says:

    Excellent essay. I lament the chaos that our egotistical search for “freedom” is responsible for; the confusion and sometimes complete inversion of basic gender roles is perverted and scary. Its a pity indeed that it is often portrayed as the intellectually desirable way to see things…modern and liberated in our bubble of perverted self-absorbtion. There is so much we should learn from the example of the Holy Family…
    peace and all good!

  3. Anonymous says:

    Jacob, I don’t know where to begin. I disagree with so many of the thoughts that you’ve posted about gender roles and about the traits that you claim are “natural” to the respective genders. (I would argue that those traits are largely the result of socialization — particularly socialization in the form of condemnation that has been experienced through the ages by girls and women who have dared to demonstrate physical, as well as intellectual, strength, and by boys and men who have dared to allow their nurturing qualities to develop in a healthy way.

    I suppose the “complete inversion” of gender roles that your other commenter mentions might include my former role as a stay-at-home parent to my son when he was very young. Your approach to gender roles would seem to preclude fathers being involved in their children’s lives to that extent. And you’re certainly welcome to that opinion, of course, especially on your own blog. But I’m so very glad that I did not miss the wonderful experiences I had with my son out of a childish fear that someone would think me unmanly — or at war with my own gender identity — for acting fully on my vocation as a nurturing spouse and parent.

    The attitudes you’ve expressed on gender strike me as a bit juvenile, or worse than that, very adult yet frighteningly rigid. In time, perhaps, your views (along with your experiences of successful, strong women and successful, caring men) will continue to evolve.

    Steve

  4. Jacob says:

    Steve,

    I spent a good deal of time and thought on this post, so I’m glad for the feedback.

    When I talk about traits that I think tend to be more present in one gender or the next, I don’t mean to set them up as exclusive to one or the other. I hoped to be clear on that in my post, but I’m genuinely sorry I wasn’t.

    I don’t hesitate to celebrate women who are strong in any way nor men who are nurturing. More than that, a man isn’t a whole man without being sensitive, nor a woman whole without being strong.

    Nor do I have any intention of endorsing the kind of condemnation that has passed for gender roles in the past. Quite the opposite – I think much of how past society has defined men & women has unnaturally limited them.

    But I would also say that many of the values that society places on men & women are equally unhealthy.

    A women dressing scantily, for instance, doesn’t prove that she is strong. And a man holding himself over women is not masculine. These are the kind of wrongs I want to highlight on my blog to teach against. There is, more and more these days, a lack of self-respect and respect for others that popular culture holds up as good.

    I think it is terribly important that young people hear a more wholesome & rounded view of gender identity, role and differences. Thats where our faith comes in, and the examples that the peoples of our tradition shine – principally in our Lord, but also reflected in the men & women of the Scriptures and the entire history of the Church, up to and through our present day. They serve as examples of how we can be men and women without sacrificing our natural dignity or denigrating that of others. And that is what I want folks to come away with from this series of posts.

    Respectfully,
    Jacob Maurer

  5. Jerry Maurer says:

    I read Steve’s comments with dismay. He seems to have missed the point I found, that a man has certain responsibilities that come with his male traits, such as greater strength. I didn’t see any veiled insults to women, only a reminder to us men that we have a responsibility to carry ourselves with dignity and allow others, both men and women, that same dignity.

    I also did not see an attack on stay-at-home dads. In fact, the traits Jacob seems to find admirable would be found in abundance in a man who would sacrifice part of his career, and endure a loss of “prestige” in societies eyes, to raise his newborn son. Steve, I can certainly appreciate the joy you experienced caring for your child. I lost my job just before my first son was born. My wife worked and I was the stay-at-home Dad for 3 months. I loved it, and my boy loved it. The bond I developed with him has lasted more than two decades and he is now a very close, dear friend. By the way, my son is Jacob Maurer. I pray your time with your son was as rewarding as mine was with mine. God Bless, Jerry Maurer

  6. Anonymous says:

    Jacob & Jerry,

    I want to thank both of you for the thoughtful quality of the responses you wrote to my response. And I do see that I misjudged the sweep of your original post, Jacob, and I apologize for that (as well as for applying the antagonistic term “juvenile” to some of your views — that adjective can be carelessly applied to anyone’s views, including my own, and I’m sorry for lashing out in that respect).

    You both make many excellent points in your remarks, and I can easily take them to heart. I suppose my underlying concern, beyond the comments I posted earlier, is that too often “greater strength” (physical strength, usually) and the “responsibility” it seems to confer on men can all too easily result in a patriarchial society — by which I mean a culture (and even legal system) in which men are granted greater authority than women. (It was less than 90 years ago in this country that women were deemed unqualified to vote in elections. As recently as 45 years ago, JFK was able to laugh off a question in a press conference about why he had appointed virtually no women to sub-cabinet level jobs. The implication of his response was that, well, men were taking care of the shop; the ladies need not worry themselves about such things.) I’m concerned that some men — not the two of you, but some men who are equally well-intentioned and perhaps more accepting of traditional gender roles than either of you — still see themselves as needing to exercise stewardship over women they care about. “Women need to be protected,” they reason, “so let me figure out how we can protect them” (as opposed to letting women speak for themselves as strong, intelligent, capable adults).

    Like you, I don’t want to see women (or men, for that matter) exploited, and God knows there’s plenty of exploitation that takes place in the name of Brittney Spears-style “empowerment.” Yet I’m equally concerned about male society stepping in as the ultimate protector of the female sex. I protect my child (who is only six), and I intend to teach him how to protect himself and stand up for people whose rights and dignity he sees being violated (be they female or male), but I hope he does not end up thinking that women are frail creatures who need his decisive input constantly. Again, I do understand that approach is not what either of you is advocating, but I think there are folks out there who would be happy to return to that paradigm, albeit perhaps in a “kinder and gentler” way than in decades past.

    Anyway, thanks for responding to my fairly heated response with light instead of more heat! You have my respect, both intellectually and otherwise. Good wishes to both of you.

    Steve

  7. Jacob says:

    Steve,

    Its fairly rare (or at least, not common enough) to have a polite conversation online, especially when there is some sort of conflict or misunderstanding going on. Thank you for sticking it out to help clarify all this. Its a pleasure to encounter that anywhere, but especially online – where a person can say whatever they’d like.

    I’m hoping to write, sometime in the near future, a post on femininity. It would be a pleasure to have you back! Whether you do or don’t, though, thank you for your time here.

    Respectfully,
    Jacob Maurer